Pure Insanity

July 17th, 2009
by admin

Good ‘ole insanity is back!

Paying 10% more than a property is “worth” is back in high fashion, and this mentality was exemplified with the recent sale on Portland Street in the thriving King West area.

What a property is “worth” is anybody’s guess, but what if a comparable sale was staring you right in the face?

insanity.jpg

I consider a “buyer’s premium” to be anything paid above what the property should reasonably sell for.

If a property is under-priced by the seller and the seller’s agent and comes onto the market at $199,900 when it “should” sell for $225,000, then a $232,000 sale price would indicate a $7,000 “buyer’s premium.”

I also call this an emotional premium.

It’s hard to pin-point a value of any house or condo in the city, but we can sure come close!

So what do we make of a condo that is “worth” $340,000 selling for $385,000?

It’s pure insanity, in my opinion.

Before you judge, let me give you the backstory…

I detailed my experiences with this unit as part of another post last week, so forgive my redundancy.

Portland Street is located in “FreedVille” where Freed Developments has built half the area and has many more projects scheduled for construction in the not-too-distant future.

It is also in the heart of the thriving King West area between Spadina and Bathurst where all the chic restaurants and bars are located for the 24 – 30 year old crowds to pounce.

Brant House, West, Conviction, Brassai, Bier Market, The Spoke Club, Cheval, and even Blowfish if you feel like walking more than three minutes; are all at your doorstep.

I knew there would be action on this very dressed-up 1-bedroom unit in a 2-year-old building on Portland Street, but never did I think I’d see the complete insanity that plagued our market in 2007.

I mentioned last week how I stood outside the building with my clients one night waiting for another Realtor to come back with the key all while other groups of buyers showed up with their agents in tow.

We ended up seeing the unit with another group, and 2-3 more groups passed us by from the front door, to the elevator, to the lobby.

It was a complete mad-house, and the subsequent insanity should have come as no surprise.

But I’m naive, I suppose, and maybe a bit old fashioned.

I don’t get drawn in my the glitz and glamour of being able to pre-drink at my Portland Street condo before stumbling a block to Brant House with my buddies while my daddy’s Visa burns a hole in my pocket.

And when I see numbers and values staring me right in the face, I use them to make a rational, informed decision.

This unit on Portland Street was listed at $325,000 and immediately became the buzz of the industry.  All my colleagues had shown it; some of them to 2-3 different clients, and every young buyer in the city was sent this listing by their Realtors.

The unit was perhaps a touch over 600 square feet, but it was meticulously staged right down to the color and organization of the bowl of jelly-belly on the counter.

It was a fantastic unit, but my buyers didn’t like the fact that the second-storey balcony overlooked the alley-way below.  With the City of Toronto not picking up garbage and the hot summer heat, it was a pass for my clients.

We did our homework in advance, however, and found that the exact same model unit had sold for $345,000 only a month prior.  This unit was on a higher floor and was facing south, meaning it didn’t look at a garbage-alley from ten feet above.

We determined that since the two units were the same inside, but not the same outside, perhaps the unit currently listed for sale was worth a hair less than the $345,000 asking price.  I told my clients $338,000 but added that there may be a buyer willing to go right up to $345,000 just to ensure he or she gets the place.

My clients are both savvy people and said, “Why would we pay the same $345,000 price for this unit when the other one was substantially better?”

I told them “you wouldn’t, but somebody else might, and probably will.”

Emotion plays a huge part of the purchase process, but none of us were ready for the final selling price.

I ask YOU, the reader, to come up with an idea right now of the “insane” price you think I’m speaking of.

Do the math yourselves – the unit is “worth” slightly less than the exact same model that sold for $345,000 a month earlier because it happens to be on the second floor over looking an alley way behind a row of King Street restaurants.

The unit is “worth” $340,000, but somebody paid more, didn’t they?

Am I talking about $350,000?

How about $360,000?

Wouldn’t that be a gas?  Somebody paying $20,000 more than all rational thought would indicate they should?

Try again.

How about $370,000 then?

No.

This unit sold for a whopping $385,000.

If you’re the guy that just paid $345,000 for the same model one month ago, congratulations – your condo just went up in value to the tune of forty-large.

But if you’re the moron that just paid a $45,000 emotional premium for this condo, please tell me WHY!

This is one circumstance where the old adage, “It’s worth what somebody is willing to pay for it” is completely false.

It’s not worth $385,000, now way, no how.

It simply can’t be worth $385,000 when the same unit just sold for $345,000!

If you are this buyer’s agent – you should be ashamed!  But you won’t be, because you’re an a**hole who sold out his clients for a $9,625 commission…

This buyer got carried away, and simply said, “Screw it,” while throwing all caution to the wind.  Perhaps the buyer had been looking for six months and finally found the “perfect” place to call home, but the price he paid should haunt him for quite some time.

One of the first things I tell my new clients is, “If you have a mental stumbling block about being in competition, you need to get over it right now.”  Because for ever Dick or Jane looking at 1 Shaw Street, 1029 King Street, or 66 Portland Street, there is a Tom, Dick, or Harry looking at the same property with the same gleam in their eyes.

But when absolute INSANITY kicks in, I tell my buyers to walk away.

The price paid for this unit on Portland Street makes me sick to my stomach, and it has nothing to do with those awful ribs left over from Sunday night that I just microwaved and downed with a large glass of milk…

It has to do with the ridiculous price that somebody paid while tearing up the comparable sales and saying, “I’ll pay anything to get this place.”

That’s when you know the market is out of control.

I can’t predict the market – I can only comment on the current conditions.

But if this sort of thing starts to happen with increasing frequency, I’ll be very, very worried as we move ahead…

http://torontorealtyblog.com/2009/07/17/pure-insanity/

reviewed by Moishe Alexander,   CFC  Canadian Funding Corp CEO

Been There, Done That…

July 17th, 2009
by admin

As the hotel investment world in 2009 painfully deals with a slumping market and problem loans, we recall that in 1993, Bruce Baltin, Senior Vice President and Consulting Practice leader in Los Angeles, wrote about solutions for his clients then and they are still appropriate today. Evaluating Performance

‘Evaluating performance – or lack thereof – for commercial properties will continue to occupy a significant portion of lender effort as the decade wears on. Distinguishing among the hopeless dogs, the chronic underachievers, and the potential comeback kids will require the careful scrutiny and judgment of the property on a case-by-case basis, and nowhere will this judgment be more critical than the area of hotel loans. Fortunately, for both the diligent borrower and lender who find themselves in a down market, a workout can be a win / win relationship…’

Lenders have three choices when faced with a non-performing loan:

• Loan restructuring – the workout solution.

• Negotiate a ‘deed in lieu’ of foreclosure or other method of transferring title, or

• Instigate title contest through local courts or, potentially, the federal bankruptcy court.

‘If the lender believes that the borrower in place can optimize cash flow to the lender, he will be far more motivated to restructure the debt. On the other hand, if the lender perceives operational or managerial weaknesses on the part of the borrower, he will be induced to push for control of the asset…

…The weaker the lender’s position relative to collateral and the weaker the asset itself, the more costly will be the process of taking possession versus restructuring the debt.’

http://www.htrends.com/article39979.html

r e v i e w e d  b y  Moishe Alexander, CFC  Canadian Funding Corp CEO

CANADIAN ALTERNATIVE FINANCING

July 16th, 2009
by admin

Setting up shop in Canada comes with its own set of obstacles and benefits. Statistics Canada reports that 75% of job creation is through small businesses. Getting a conventional loan is one of the biggest challenges. Canada’s major banks have big profits yet are not supportive of small businesses. Venture capital is scarce.

Working Ventures, sponsored by the Canadian Federation of Labor, is the first national, labor-sponsored investment fund in the world. Its goal is long-term capital appreciation for shareholders, providing risk capital (between $250,000 and $10 million) to high-growth and medium-sized Canadian businesses. All Canadians who invest in Working Fund receive tax credits.

Therefore, in Canada, alternative funding is easier to obtain. From customers and suppliers to corporate lenders and government programs, customer financing has minimal paperwork.

Human Resources Development Canada offers self-employment assistance to employment insurance recipients who want to start their own businesses. There are even Community Loan Associations in each province.

Canadian Alternative Investment Co-operative in Toronto, Ontario, was formed in the early 1980’s by a number of religious communities pooling resources to make investments towards positive social change. CAIC offers loans, mortgages, and equity investments for community-based projects.

BRIDGE LOANS

Bridge loans are loans that are generally very short term, easier to acquire and with quick approval times. Their main advantage is speed and the ability to quickly close, save property from foreclosure or other situations which generally come on short notice and require fast money. Bridge loans are extremely convenient and useful when you absolutely can’t wait for a standard loan. Other names for bridge loans include “interim financing,” “gap financing,” and “swing loans.”

“If you owe the bank $100 that’s your problem. If you owe the bank $100 million, that’s the bank’s problem.”

—Paul Getty

As the terms “interim financing” and “gap financing” imply, bridge loans are also used to fill in the gaps during cash-flow shortages or to finance businesses or business operations in the interim between larger loans. They also come in handy between business startup financing and more permanent financing. Bridge loans are often used on short notice for real estate purposes. The range can stretch from two weeks to three years, and the amount of the loan and interest rates are only really limited by the customer’s credit. However, the amount of the loan generally won’t be as high as long-term loans would be, and interest rates generally run several percentage points higher.

Ilya Bodner
Small Business Owner

http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/ilya-bodner/true-business-credit-card/canadian-alternative-financing

reviewed by Moishe Alexander, CFC Canadian Funding Corp CEO