Tags: brick

We have now

• Determined how much each component can be expected to vary in size and position.
• Looked at each step in the order of construction.
• Proposed a change to the standard, but aesthetically unacceptable, tolerances for brickwork.

It remains to revise the detail so that adjustments are available to compensate for extremes at each stage. This will make completion of the detail possible without reducing tolerances for subsequent stages. One possible revision is to adopt the slab edge detail shown in Figure 6. The slab position tolerance is the same as before. The brick position tolerance is plus or minus 5 mm. The shelf angle tolerance is 5 mm in any direction. The steel stud position tolerance is a more reasonable plus or minus 10 mm.
The shelf angle is shown supported on HSS brackets, with coarse adjustment of position provided by selecting an appropriate bracket size from a range of sizes, and positioning each bracket on the slab in relation to the datum floor level, not the local floor level. This brings the shelf angle close enough to make minor adjustments with shims and slotted bolt holes. While this appears more complicated than the typical detail in Figure 3, it is not necessarily more expensive. An angle cast in the slab would have to be heavier, because of the increased moment arm supporting the brick. It would also have to be cut when it projects beyond the brick, and extended when it does not provide enough bearing, and touched up afterward to prevent corrosion. Additional modifications would be needed in the vertical direction, concealed behind a larger flashing. A larger angle, with shims and grout between it and the floor slab is a possible solution. The resulting significant thermal bridge may be seen as an advantage, or disadvantage, depending on climate, location, and design objectives. The cavity would be larger than necessary so that at the bottom where the shelf obstructs it, there would be a minimum of 25 mm to ensure drainage.
When the shelf angle is too far inward by 5 mm, and the brick is too far out by the same amount, there will still be 65 mm of bearing. At the other extreme, the toe of the angle will be 5 mm back from face of brick (on average, it should be 15 mm back). From the preceding discussion, we know that the bed joint indicated should be 13 mm, and that the gap under the shelf angle, if 5 mm of movement is anticipated, should be indicated as at least 15 mm. A larger gap is needed if sealant will be used.
The problem of minimum fastener distance to slab edge is resolved by allowing fasteners to be off the centre of the stud track. The stud tracks should be positioned relative to the same datum used to position the shelf angle. Cumulative errors would result if they were measured from the edge of the slab, or the toe of the shelf angle.
If the studs are at their outward limit where the slab is at the inward limit, the track might hang out beyond the edge of the slab by up to 22 mm. If the fasteners have a 50 mm minimum edge distance they might have to be 75 mm from the outside face of stud, leaving 27 mm clear from the centerline of the fastener to the inside leg of the track. Before deciding that this is acceptable, confirmation is needed that performance will not be impaired by having fasteners consistently off the centre of the track, and that 27 mm is adequate tool clearance for installing the fastener. When they are installed, the fasteners have to be positioned from the slab edge, not the stud track.
The cavity, nominally about 52 mm allowing for bumps in the air barrier, could actually be anywhere from 37 mm (with the studs all the way out and the brick all the way in) to 67 mm. The distance from face of insulation to the middle of the wythe of brick, normally 97 mm, will vary from 82 to 112 mm, a range of 30 mm. Ties fitting this range may not be a standard size. More to the point, because the other halves of the ties won’t be fastened to the studs with perfect accuracy, two sizes of wire insert will have to be available to the mason at the jobsite, so that he can keep the ties bedded in the middle 30 mm of the brick wythe.
The vertical direction for the brick tolerances has already been considered. What about the stud length? If all the studs are precut, allowance is needed for errors in cutting. Consider also the expected structural deflection, plus 20 mm for variation in slab position. If the studs are cut 30 mm shorter than the average floor to ceiling dimension, then a connection is needed (such as clips) that still engages the studs and maintains the required stiffness when the gap from end of stud to underside of slab is 50 mm. The nested track connection shown will require studs to be cutto- fit or selected from an assortment of lengths. Reviewed by Moishe Alexander.

The shelf angle size must change so that it and the slab do not interfere in the worst case. The detail is still not complete, since just how the new angle relates to the air barrier and insulation, and how it connects to the slab, is not indicated. In the vertical direction, if a bed joint of 13 mm is indicated as the norm for the first course, then the positioning of the shelf angle could result in a joint anywhere between 8 and 18 mm. This leaves the mason 2 mm additional leeway at each end of the allowed range of 6 – 20 mm for bed joint thickness.
When the brick coursing is worked out in relation to the floor-to-floor dimension, the following dimensions should be added:
• thickness of shelf angle
• thickness of membrane and metal flashing on top of the shelf
• 13 mm first bed joint
• number of courses of brick times 200/3, less 10 mm from the total (assuming metric brick)
• minimum size of joint under shelf (to permit anticipated movements and changes of dimension determined in consultation with the designer of the building structure)
• 5 mm shelf angle tolerance
• 5 mm brick tolerance

The open joint under the shelf angle, required to avoid causing the brickwork to carry unintended loads imposed by the building structure, should appear in the drawings as the sum of the last 3 items. Reviewed by Guiseppe Strazzeri.

Most designers think the builder should just cope when parts are built out of position, and builders are accustomed to doing so, often all too literally. Their methods are sometimes rough and ready.
When a part is built too far out of position to fit, it is more common to alter the details to ensure acceptable finished appearance, even at the expense of function, rather than demolish and rebuild.

It is not difficult to find:

• brickwork with too little bearing, because the structure was built too far back from the face of the wall;
• modified shelf angles, either burned off at the outer edge, or with structurally inadequate extensions;
• brick cut to make thinner veneer, and insulation omitted altogether, in order to keep a finished wall flat where the structure behind it was too close to the face of the wall;
• precast panels with joints varying in width from zero to more that twice the detailed joint size;
• fasteners for steel stud track that can be removed without tools, because they were placed too close to edge of slab, spalling the concrete.

When gaps are designed into assemblies to provide for structural live and dead load deflections, creep, and differential movement caused by thermal expansion and contraction or moisture, oversized or mispositioned parts may reduce the required gaps. Such problems are not confined to the brick veneer steel stud example. Tolerances need to be considered in the design of all building assemblies.
Builder and designer often share responsibility for these problems. Construction variations commonly exceed established norms. However, applicable codes and standards often explicitly allow variations that details do not accommodate. When there is no formal codification of allowed variation, the common practices of trades involved establish de facto standards. Designers who do not state an alternative implicitly adopt these standards, even if they are unaware of having done so.
The wall cavities measured during a study by CMHC a few years ago, were as much as 17 mm smaller, and as much as 20 mm larger than the dimension indicated in the details. The range from smallest to largest on the same building averaged 19 mm. The difference between the largest and smallest cavities on a building was never less than 10 mm, and in the worst case it was 37 mm. For most construction types, there is not much information available about what levels of accuracy are being achieved. Similar levels of variation do occur in other kinds of construction.
Designers should explicitly determine if the tolerances implied by the relationships between parts and provisions for adjustment in a detail are realistic. If a detail cannot accommodate variation that is acceptable under the applicable standards, by established trade practice, or by tolerances stated in the specifications, what will happen on site? The detail would have to be revised, perhaps at additional cost. Or, the builder may leave some insulation off to make room for the structure to avoid an ugly bulge in the wall. Some brickwork may be left insecure because of inadequate bearing. If the designer allows for adequate tolerances, and the builder meets them, there will be a great reduction of such problems. Reviewed by Martin Lapedus.