Tags: Program

11 Mar 2010, Comments Off

Collingwood Celebrates New Affordable Housing

Author: admin

The Government of Canada, the Government of Ontario, the County of Simcoe and the Town of Collingwood today celebrated the opening of 18 new affordable rental units. This project, located at 145 High Street, is supported by more than $1.2 million in funding through the Canada – Ontario Affordable Housing Program.

The Honourable Helena Guergis, Minister of State (Status of Women) and Member of Parliament for Simcoe – Grey, on behalf of the Honourable Diane Finley, Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development and Minister Responsible for Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation; and Aileen Carroll, Member of Provincial Parliament for Barrie, on behalf of the Honourable Jim Bradley, Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing; Cal Patterson, Warden of Simcoe County; Chris Carrier, Mayor of Collingwood, and John Fogolin, President of Mirten Collingwood Ltd attended the ceremony.

“This renovation project is a good way to get the local economy moving because it puts construction workers and trades people to work quickly,” said Minister Guergis. “The federal government is stimulating the economy and creating jobs to help Canadians recover from the economic downturn.”

“These 18 units will have an important impact on its residents’ lives and the community,” said MPP Carroll. “I would like to congratulate the developer and community groups for making this project a reality.”

Today’s announcement recognized the opening of a 30-unit housing facility that provides 18 affordable housing units for low to moderate income single people and families and individuals with special needs. The federal and provincial allocations to the project were complemented by over $620,000 in municipal grants.

“The County of Simcoe is proud to partner with other levels of government and with our member municipalities to provide affordable housing options for our residents,” stated County Warden Cal Patterson. “These 18 new units give those in need in Collingwood access to supportive units as well as affordable housing.”

“Collingwood is home to many families with a wide range of needs and one of the particular needs is for quality, affordable, housing stock. A good place to call home. This project is a great example of cooperation between the Province of Ontario, the County of Simcoe and the Town of Collingwood meeting the need to provide a choice that for the last many years has not been available in our community,” stated Mayor Chris Carrier, for the Town of Collingwood. “The private developer, President of Mirten Collingwood Ltd, Mr. John Fogolin, made this project an easy sell to our community due to the beautiful design of the building and affordable rent.”

“I must say that because of the extremely hard work, by all the various stakeholders, this unique project happened,” said the President of Mirten Collingwood Ltd., John Fogolin. “I am also very encouraged by how successful the project is and hope that it helps to address the need in this community for Affordable Housing.”

The Canada – Ontario Affordable Housing Program Agreement comprises a commitment of $301 million from each of the two senior levels of government. In total, the federal, provincial and municipal governments will invest at least $734 million in the program, which will provide affordable housing for up to 20,000 households in Ontario.

In 2008, the Government of Canada committed more than $1.9 billion over the next five years to improve and build new affordable housing and to help the homeless. Canada’s Economic Action Plan builds on this with an additional one-time investment of more than $2 billion over two years in new and existing social housing and lending of up to another $2 billion to municipalities for housing-related infrastructure. Combined for Ontario, this means a further $1.2-billion joint investment under the amended Canada – Ontario Affordable Housing Program Agreement. The federal and provincial governments are contributing equally to this overall investment.

11 Apr 2009, Comments Off

CFC Reviews CMHC Design Report: IDP — Objections to IDP

Author: admin

It is worth discussing some of the standard objections that are raised to the Integrated Design Process. The objections usually are phrased as the following: “We’ve always done IDP” – That may be true, and if so, keep doing it. Usually the people who say this, however, have remarkably few green buildings to show as evidence.
“If you want me to do something different, that implies I’ve been doing it wrong all these years” – Well no, it doesn’t. This is the 21st century, with an entirely new situation for human society, and new problems and demands for the profession to respond to. Think of IDP as a new tool to add to the toolbox to address this new situation.
“The client won’t pay for it” – Possibly not, especially the first time when the value has not been demonstrated to the client, but that’s exactly what is the intent of NRCan’s Commercial Building Incentive Program.
“It affects the schedule and budget” – It may do, but the benefits should more than outweigh the impacts. Experienced teams are finding that the time spent is merely shifted from the latter stages of the design process to the earlier stages. Design costs may or may not be greater. It depends on how well the team manages the project and captures inherent synergies. It is not as if traditional projects always come in on time and under budget. The BC Cancer Agency’s new laboratory in Vancouver, a LEED Gold building, was designed with an IDP process and came in on time, and $10 million under the $100 million budget.
“It means a loss of creative control as an architect” – Not from what I have observed. After all, what generates more creativity—a blank sheet of paper or fitting the program to a tricky site? An integrated design process often generates more creative ideas and solutions. A good analogy is that the architect goes from being a soloist to being the conductor. In any performance the conductor is always visible, and wears a different suit and often his name is in the spotlight. Reviewed by Moishe Alexander.

Governments, utilities and many clients want you to use IDP. Natural Resources Canada’s (NRCan) Commercial Building Incentive Program (CBIP) is expressly designed to provide monetary assistance to owners and design teams to enable them to spend the time to implement integrated design on your projects. This program grew out of experience that NRCan had in the 1990s with C-2000, a demonstration program.
The experience was that some additional design expertise was needed, but that most building performance gains came from a change in the process, and the most
successful projects employed the IDP. Several utilities have programs that support IDP. BC Hydro has its High Performance Building Program that provides co-funding to perform energy studies and it is about to launch a program to promote IDP.
Enbridge Gas Distribution and Union Gas in Ontario jointly offer a Design Assistance Program that provides a fixed incentive for design activities that improve your building’s energy and environmental performance. Enbridge also has a New Building Construction Program that provides incentives for adding some efficiency measures.
Mountain Equipment Co-op, which has built some of the most progressive green buildings in Canada, seeks to improve performance with each new store and requires its design teams to utilize IDP.
It was key to achieving the impressive performance these buildings have demonstrated to date Green Buildings BC, a program that provided tools and resources to help B.C.
education and health care agencies build green buildings, recognizes the value of IDP in its Guide to Value Analysis and the Integrated Design Process.
Clients who do not explicitly ask you to use IDP likely would do so if they knew the value that IDP and green design could add to their projects. Reviewed by Guiseppe Strazzeri.