Tags: rate

15 Jun 2009, Comments Off

Housing starts rebound to top forecast in May

Author: admin

Canada’s housing construction sector had a better-than-expected May as the seasonally adjusted, annualized rate of starts rose to 128,400 for the month.
Moishe Alexander reviews the trends:

That was ahead of the 126,000 annualized rate that economists had forecast.

In April, the seasonally adjusted annualized rate was 117,600.

“This morning’s housing starts data for May from CMHC provided us with the first sign that a bottom might be forming in Canadian homebuilding activity,” said TD Bank economist Pascal Gauthier.

“Nation-wide homebuilding activity recorded its first broadly based increase since October 2008, both in terms of unit types (singles and multiples) and regions of the country,” he said.

The federal government agency said urban single-home starts increased by 11.1 per cent to 46,900 units last month, while urban multiple-units starts, such as condominiums, rose by a similar percentage to 60,900.

May’s seasonally adjusted annual rate of urban starts increased 22.0 per cent in Ontario, 16.8 per cent in the Prairies, 7.3 per cent in Atlantic Canada, and 3.3 per cent in Quebec. Urban starts declined 5.0 per cent in British Columbia.

Showing how much housing has retreated since last year, the overall seasonally adjusted, annualized rate of construction starts stood at 221,300 units in May 2008.

CMHC said housing starts are expected to improve throughout 2009 and over the next several years “to gradually become more closely aligned to demographic demand, which is currently estimated at about 175,000 units per year.”

Gauthier said starts are expected to remain around 120,000 on average through the remainder of this year.

“The good news part [in that forecast] is that homebuilding activity would cease to be a drag on economic growth and employment heading into next year,” he said.

“The bad news part, assuming our forecast unfolds, is that we do not expect the level of starts to head back above 150,000 units before 2011.” Posted by Thaddeus Warchol

15 Jun 2009, Comments Off

Housing Starts Are Up

Author: admin

Moishe Alexander brings to attention:

Canadian housing starts rose 9.2 percent in May, slightly better than expected, and was broadly based and encompassed both single and multiple segments, the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp (CMHC) said on Monday. New home construction rose to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 128,400 units in May from 117,600 units units in April, CMHC said.

The number of starts in May beat analysts’ consensus expectations of 125,300 starts.

The seasonally adjusted annual rate of urban starts rose 11.1 percent to 107,800 units in May. Urban multiple starts rose to 60,900 units, while urban single starts climbed to 46,900 units in May.

The seasonally adjusted annual rate of urban starts in May rose 22 percent in Ontario, 16.8 percent in the Prairies, 7.3 percent in Atlantic Canada and 3.3 percent in Quebec.

This Month In Real Estate (Canada): April 2009

Urban starts declined 5 percent in British Columbia.

CMHC said housing starts are expected to improve throughout 2009 and over the next several years to “become more closely aligned to demographic demand,” which is currently estimated at about 175,000 units per year.

Ryan Roberts,

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

1 Apr 2009, Comments Off

CFC Reviews CMHC Design Report on: U-factor

Author: admin

The U-factor (sometimes called U-value) is a measure of the amount of heat loss due to conduction and convection. It is the reciprocal of the R-value, which measures thermal resistance (i.e., U=1÷R), so a window with a high U-factor has a low R-value. The U-factor is preferred when referring to windows. Where U-factor is reported in non-metric units of BTU/ (h-ft.2-°F), multiply by 5.678 to convert to metric units of W/(m2-°C).
A quick examination of the units reveals the usefulness of the U-factor. Whether in metric or non-metric, the U-factor measures a rate of heat transfer per unit area, per unit temperature difference. Thus, multiplying the U-factor by the window area and the appropriate temperature difference (either the average value, to get “typical” results, or the largest temperature difference for the location of interest, to get the worst case) gives a rate of heat loss, in watts or BTU/hr. This rate of heat loss (in winter) must be counteracted by supplying heat at the same rate from some auxiliary source, such as a furnace or unit heater if the room temperature is to be maintained.

Be cautious, says Marty Lapedus.

Window manufacturers may have historically quoted R-values that were for centre-glass and now refer to the centreglass U-factor when describing their product. This does not include heat loss through the frame and sash assembly, which can be significant. It is more appropriate to use total-product U-factor.
U-factors and R-values are determined either by physical tests (using ASTM or AAMA tests) or by computer simulation using the FRAME and VISION programs, as defined in the CSA A440.2 Standard.
VISION evaluates the centre-glass portion of the window, whereas FRAME analyzes the frame–sash assembly and the edge-glass region (the glazed area within 63.5 mm [2.5 in.] of the sightline of the window). In the U.S., computer-simulated values are generated using programs called THERM and WINDOW. These component values are area-weighted to define a total-product U-factor for the window, door or other envelope area of interest.
Three sources for total-window U-values are
1. the Canadian Window and Door Manufacturer’s Association (CWDMA) Certified Products List (first edition, January, 1995)
2. the ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals
3. the (U.S.) National Fenestration Rating Council Certified Products Directory.
Data for all sources was generated by computer simulation (using FRAME and VISION in Canada, and THERM and WINDOW in the U.S.). The CWDMA source also lists data for window SHGC, ABC ratings (resistance to air leakage, wind-driven rain, and wind deflection), energy ratings and, in some cases, condensation resistance (see the following sections).

Solar Heat Gain Coefficient

The solar heat gain coefficient (SHGC) is the amount of solar radiation incident on the exterior surface of a window that is transmitted through the window to appear as solar gains in the building. It is a decimal fraction with a value between 0.0 and 1.0 (that is, from completely opaque to completely transparent). Practical considerations limit the range of SHGC to 0.20 for a glazing system with reflective and tinted glass, to 0.87 for a single-glazed system.
Older texts refer to the shading coefficient (SC), which is the SHGC of a window relative to the SHGC of a single-glazed window at the same conditions. The SC multiplied by 0.87 provides a reasonably close approximation of the SHGC for most glazing systems.
The total-product SHGC should be used when referring to windows. Total SHGC includes solar heat gain through the frame and sash (admittedly, a small value) and gain through the glazing system, and is a smaller value than the centre-glass SHGC.
The “Fenestration” chapter of the ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals (chapter 31 in the 2005 edition) is a good source for SHGC values. SHGC should not be confused with visible transmission, which is discussed later in this article.