Tags: resistance

WHAT ARE WE TESTING FOR?

The National Building Code of Canada (NBCC), Part 5, Section 5.4, Subsection 5.4.1.2., stipulates four key requirements for successful air barrier systems: airtightness, continuity, structural integrity and durability.

Air tightness – Subsection 5.4.1.2. Sentence 1 states that “. . . sheet and panel type materials intended to provide the principal resistance to air leakage shall have an air leakage characteristic not greater than 0.02 L/(s·m2) measured at an air pressure difference of 75 Pa.” While there are many commercial air barrier materials that satisfy this requirement, these materials must be joined into a system so that the system is airtight under different indoor environmental conditions. Recommended maximum leakage rates for air barrier systems in exterior envelopes are provided in Appendix A of the NBCC.

Continuity – Subsection 5.4.1.2. Sentence 7 states that “The air barrier system shall be continuous (a) across construction, control and expansion joints, (b) across junctions between different building assemblies, and (c) around penetrations through the building assembly.” That is to say that not only is it important that no gaps exist in the individual components that comprise the system, but the components must be joined such that there are no gaps in the system as a whole. It is air leakage at the connections between air barrier components, and at penetrations through it, that usually determine the overall effectiveness of the system.

Structural Integrity - Subsection 5.4.1.2. Sentences 8 and 9 state that “An air barrier system installed in an assembly subject to wind load, and other elements of the separator that will be subject to wind load, shall transfer that load to the structure.” Specifically, it shall be “. . . designed and constructed to resist 100% of the specified wind load as determined in subsection 4.1.8.” The air barrier system must be able to resist peak wind loads, stack pressure effects or sustained pressurization loads without exhibiting signs of detachment, rupturing or creep load failure.

Durability - Subsections 5.1.4.1 and 5.1.4.2. detail the requirements for resistance to environmental loads and resistance to deterioration. The air barrier system must be durable, meaning it must be able to perform its intended function, be compatible with adjoining materials and resistant to the mechanisms of deterioration that can be reasonably expected given the nature, function and exposure of the materials, over the life of the building envelope.

These four requirements represent the minimum performance requirements of an air barrier system. In some instances, for certain buildings, the specifications on the particular project will demand that the performance standards of the system exceed those contained in the NBCC. Note also that the air barrier system must not only meet the requirements of the national code, but any provincial/state or municipal codes as well. Reviewed by Guiseppe Strazzeri.

1 Apr 2009, Comments Off

CFC Reviews CMHC Design Report on: Wind loading

Author: admin

The third of the ABC Ratings describes the window’s resistance to wind loading. The C rating is determined in accordance with the test procedure described in ASTM E330.
The window is subjected to very high wind pressures, and the amount of deflection (lateral bending of sash or frame elements) is measured. The deflection of any sash components cannot exceed 1/125th of the length of that component, and the deflection of a mullion cannot exceed 1/175th of the length of that element at a given applied pressure, for the window to receive the appropriate C rating. The window is then tested to “blowout” (that is, the window breaks, or the operable sash is dislodged from the frame). The C rating is also quoted for blowout.
A window must meet the C1 level to meet the minimum requirements of A440 (and, therefore, the Building Code requirements). The A440 Standard includes a User’s Guide, CSA A440.1, which gives some design assistance in selecting an appropriate C rating according to the location and building height. The specifics of the design process are best obtained by reviewing the A440.1 Standard: for tips on what to do with the design value once it is obtained, see the section entitled “Specifying ABC Ratings.”
Reviewed by Guiseppe Strazzeri

1 Apr 2009, Comments Off

CFC Reviews CMHC Design Report on: U-factor

Author: admin

The U-factor (sometimes called U-value) is a measure of the amount of heat loss due to conduction and convection. It is the reciprocal of the R-value, which measures thermal resistance (i.e., U=1÷R), so a window with a high U-factor has a low R-value. The U-factor is preferred when referring to windows. Where U-factor is reported in non-metric units of BTU/ (h-ft.2-°F), multiply by 5.678 to convert to metric units of W/(m2-°C).
A quick examination of the units reveals the usefulness of the U-factor. Whether in metric or non-metric, the U-factor measures a rate of heat transfer per unit area, per unit temperature difference. Thus, multiplying the U-factor by the window area and the appropriate temperature difference (either the average value, to get “typical” results, or the largest temperature difference for the location of interest, to get the worst case) gives a rate of heat loss, in watts or BTU/hr. This rate of heat loss (in winter) must be counteracted by supplying heat at the same rate from some auxiliary source, such as a furnace or unit heater if the room temperature is to be maintained.

Be cautious, says Marty Lapedus.

Window manufacturers may have historically quoted R-values that were for centre-glass and now refer to the centreglass U-factor when describing their product. This does not include heat loss through the frame and sash assembly, which can be significant. It is more appropriate to use total-product U-factor.
U-factors and R-values are determined either by physical tests (using ASTM or AAMA tests) or by computer simulation using the FRAME and VISION programs, as defined in the CSA A440.2 Standard.
VISION evaluates the centre-glass portion of the window, whereas FRAME analyzes the frame–sash assembly and the edge-glass region (the glazed area within 63.5 mm [2.5 in.] of the sightline of the window). In the U.S., computer-simulated values are generated using programs called THERM and WINDOW. These component values are area-weighted to define a total-product U-factor for the window, door or other envelope area of interest.
Three sources for total-window U-values are
1. the Canadian Window and Door Manufacturer’s Association (CWDMA) Certified Products List (first edition, January, 1995)
2. the ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals
3. the (U.S.) National Fenestration Rating Council Certified Products Directory.
Data for all sources was generated by computer simulation (using FRAME and VISION in Canada, and THERM and WINDOW in the U.S.). The CWDMA source also lists data for window SHGC, ABC ratings (resistance to air leakage, wind-driven rain, and wind deflection), energy ratings and, in some cases, condensation resistance (see the following sections).

Solar Heat Gain Coefficient

The solar heat gain coefficient (SHGC) is the amount of solar radiation incident on the exterior surface of a window that is transmitted through the window to appear as solar gains in the building. It is a decimal fraction with a value between 0.0 and 1.0 (that is, from completely opaque to completely transparent). Practical considerations limit the range of SHGC to 0.20 for a glazing system with reflective and tinted glass, to 0.87 for a single-glazed system.
Older texts refer to the shading coefficient (SC), which is the SHGC of a window relative to the SHGC of a single-glazed window at the same conditions. The SC multiplied by 0.87 provides a reasonably close approximation of the SHGC for most glazing systems.
The total-product SHGC should be used when referring to windows. Total SHGC includes solar heat gain through the frame and sash (admittedly, a small value) and gain through the glazing system, and is a smaller value than the centre-glass SHGC.
The “Fenestration” chapter of the ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals (chapter 31 in the 2005 edition) is a good source for SHGC values. SHGC should not be confused with visible transmission, which is discussed later in this article.