Details that don’t take allowed tolerances into account don’t work on the job. They can lead to improvisations that may, or may not, impair future performance. “May” is more likely. Good practice dictates that professionals should design enough leeway into the details to allow for acceptable tolerances. This will take some extra effort in design, but if a designer gets a reputation for buildable details, or if he does design-build work, the added effort should pay off in the long run. Unless the project’s specifications explicitly supplant the tolerances specified in applicable standards or established by trade practice, the designer could be found responsible for resulting problems if the details do not accommodate those tolerances. If nothing else, he’d have to accept brick walls as much as 20 mm out of plane. This has not always been true – tolerances are gradually being incorporated into the mandatory sections of standards that once mentioned them in non-mandatory appendices, or not at all.
At present, there is not enough information available about most construction materials and methods to determine with confidence the probability of an error of a given magnitude. When standards use statistical tolerances (as in the case of concrete), the contract should establish a definite cut-off between what the details will accommodate, and what the builder will be required to correct at his own expense. A tolerance of “plus or minus 15 mm 90% of the time” cannot be used to reject any single instance and does not rule out larger errors with lower frequencies of occurrence.
A simple, if conservative, way to see if a detail will accommodate construction tolerances is to take the following steps:
• determine the tolerances specified in standards, or achievable for each material or system involved,
• work through the order of construction, checking to see if positions or tolerances at each stage are constrained by possible errors in previous stages,
• consider establishing tolerances different from the standards, if this seems likely to be the most economical way to resolve conflicts, and
• revise the detail by adding adjustable connections, variable toppings, larger and more variable gaps, or other means of adjustment to eliminate tolerance overlaps.
Zero tolerance is not reasonable, or even possible. Provide for what you think is reasonable, and think through the consequences to make sure the stated requirements are consistent with one another. If the applicable standards and personal experience don’t provide enough information, consult with experienced trades people. (For example, ask a mason about concrete tolerances). Finally, let the builder know what you’ve allowed for, and who has to pay when accidents happen anyway. Reviewed by Guiseppe Strazzeri.
